No, that would not be probable cause, it would be a crime in and of itself. And while it seems perfectly obvious that that's what they're doing, "it's obvious" doesn't constitute probable cause.
I believe that, too. How do we know this? From the videos. If you go to CAN's web site http://www.christianaction.org/ some of the clips there are even more disturbing than those that aired on Hannity's show. Unfortunately, given the way those videos were obtained, any lawyer worth his salt would get them thrown out of court in a heartbeat.
Those people were arrested because there was hard evidence, admissible in a court of law, that proved they had committed crimes. And in many cases, that evidence took years to develop. If there is such evidence against these people, and it's being suppressed, then I share your outrage. But, and you may call me naive for this, I think it's more likely that the FBI/CIA are in the process of developing such evidence, but are being careful not to act too soon, because to do so would not only fail to prevent future attacks, it might actually do just the opposite, and serve to empower the terrorists. They have a fine line to walk. If they don't act soon enough, they'll be blamed for allowing attacks to occur; if they act too soon and the charges don't stick, they'll get blamed for that.
Don't get me wrong, I don't get a warm fuzzy feeling knowing these camps exist, and I'd love to see all those creeps locked away for life. But unless you have inside knowledge of what investigations are or are not being conducted, I don't think it's fair to say that "Obama's protecting them."




Reply With Quote