Yep, and fully stated that I was doing so. Like I said, trying to lump people as "liberal" or "conservative" is a mistake. I think it is dishonest to show an extreme example, and then claim that all people who can be considered "liberal" or "conservative" share those views (as in Grumpy's original post). I think I was pretty clear in my examples to note that those were the extremes I was talking about and at the same time taking a shot at the original post....Take a look at the thread, you picked extreme examples in almost every case...
Except in extreme cases (like when the mother's life is at risk), I do not agree with that. If you have to have an abortion, do it early.... Ginsberg was the sole voter FOR partial birth abortions...
Had not heard of those. Honestly, I don't care one way or the other if "in god we trust" is left on money or removed....Or should we just print several versions like the recent run of state quarters? Can't wait to collect my "In'shalah" dollar bill....
Me either. My point is that many people who have not looked at the data, and would not know what to do with the data if they had it in front of them, seem to want to claim its all a hoax or its all 100% correct. Plenty of internet experts out there. This is one of the problems with making such things political. You have people who have no business making decisions doing so based on little to no good data at all....I'm no expert on climate change....
You know what, we need to fish sometime. I know MHall was much easier to tolerate after he and I fished together(I'm sure he feels the reverse is true too!).
Andrew
Reply With Quote
