The missus went to register my stepdaughter's car today. While she was there she was told that taxes are going up for SUV's and trucks. She said one guy said his registration went up 60$. Didn't Obama say he wasn't gonna raise taxes?

| Search Fishin.com |
The missus went to register my stepdaughter's car today. While she was there she was told that taxes are going up for SUV's and trucks. She said one guy said his registration went up 60$. Didn't Obama say he wasn't gonna raise taxes?
As much as I regret giving Obama credit for anything, he did not raise your state taxes on your autos. That would have been done by our favorite govenor and legislators.
No but wait the original reason the taxes went up was all due to the Cash for Clunker's program.... Which the Potus initiated and got passed thru to help the population buy new vehicles.
The used car market was dried up and since their were not as many used vehicles on the roads...The State's had to raise the value of all tehnwere and older vehicles still around...Hence the raise in the cost of your vehicle registrations to get more money flowing back into the States budget accounts...
SO YES IT WAS OBAMA"S FAULT........
Now I am certainly not an Obama fan...but the Cash for Clunkers program as I understood it meant you got bucks for trading in your old vehicle for a new one...so tax had to be paid on all the new vehicles...which are now old used vehicles...and those vehicles are worth more than the ones traded in so the tax base should have gone up...but then again math was never my strong suit, but common sense has been.
By the way, I have not seen any lack of used vehicles on any of the lots down in this area....nor guys in plaid suits on tv yelling at us to come buy them....LOL
Now I am certainly not an Obama fan...but the Cash for Clunkers program as I understood it meant you got bucks for trading in your old vehicle for a new one...so tax had to be paid on all the new vehicles...which are now old used vehicles...and those vehicles are worth more than the ones traded in so the tax base should have gone up...but then again math was never my strong suit, but common sense has been.
By the way, I have not seen any lack of used vehicles on any of the lots down in this area....nor guys in plaid suits on tv yelling at us to come buy them....LOL
Dave, stop with all the facts and common sense, you are killing our thoughts.....plus it makes Clyde's head hurt, he is a Hoosier fan after all.
There might not be a lack of used vehicles, but the costs for the one's out there have shot sky high since the Cash for (cough, cough, choke, blah) Clunkers (COUGH!) program.
"Cash for Clunkers"...this term will never be forgotten....none of us will be around to see it but I foresee elementary students being taught history lessons about this program in the year 2096!
"Cash for Clunkers", I can't help but laugh and shake my head in disbelief when I hear the phrase.
To cover the taxable gain, most dealers took the incentive money and added it to the trade-in vehicles value. That way the dealer shows more sunk cost, and less taxable gain, but the amount reported to Nada becomes artificially higher. And that benefits the dealers again, because they now get to sell that clunker and get more money ouf of it, as they negotiate and show you the Nada book.Now I am certainly not an Obama fan...but the Cash for Clunkers program as I understood it meant you got bucks for trading in your old vehicle for a new one...so tax had to be paid on all the new vehicles...which are now old used vehicles...and those vehicles are worth more than the ones traded in so the tax base should have gone up...but then again math was never my strong suit, but common sense has been.
By the way, I have not seen any lack of used vehicles on any of the lots down in this area....nor guys in plaid suits on tv yelling at us to come buy them....LOL
My cash for clunker deal: I took my clunker, put some cash in it to fix it up, and told the dealer to go get a job at Walmart to make up the difference![]()
I thought under the Cash for Clunkers program, the clunkers traded in had to be destroyed, and couldn't be re-sold?To cover the taxable gain, most dealers took the incentive money and added it to the trade-in vehicles value. That way the dealer shows more sunk cost, and less taxable gain, but the amount reported to Nada becomes artificially higher. And that benefits the dealers again, because they now get to sell that clunker and get more money ouf of it, as they negotiate and show you the Nada book.
That's what I remember too...something they filled the engine blocks with (cement?) to make them permanently disfunctional, then they wrote "Clunker" across the windshield or something...and from there I assumed each "clunker" was sold for scrap, the ENTIRE vehicle was sold for scrap, none of it being salvaged. This is how I remember it.
What a waste!
The only thing that the cash for clunkers program did was take a bunch of Obama bumper stickers off the road.That's what I remember too...something they filled the engine blocks with (cement?) to make them permanently disfunctional, then they wrote "Clunker" across the windshield or something...and from there I assumed each "clunker" was sold for scrap, the ENTIRE vehicle was sold for scrap, none of it being salvaged. This is how I remember it.
What a waste!
Come on Sarge you know down deep you are an Obama fan. Go ahead come outa the closet you will feel better for it.![]()
![]()
