I believe Don is right in what's going on in Wisconsin in that what's going on up there isn't about big Corporations and Unions, it's about tax payers and Unions. The thing is they're running out of money FAST, and they (the government) need to stop the bleeding. I feel that unions have no place in government. Electrical workers Union, U.A.W. and others that's fine, if they want to have their unions and if people want to work for them that's fine too, but having a teachers union? Naw...I don't think it's right, not right at all! Heck...every school board employee pays union dues to the teachers union don't they, whether they're a teacher or not, janitor's, kitchen workers, you name it...engineers at facility planning units are part of it too I believe. If teachers get raises then so do the folks at the main facility, it works the other way around to, no raise for teachers = no raise for the folks in engineering.
And then....what's all this stuff about a government employee being able to buy x-amount of years of their retirement? I know there have been folks who worked for the government their entire working career and was able to retire in their 40's!!...ok, if you have pen and paper write this down....Let's say employee A retires in their 40's, now we gotta hire employee B to replace them. Employee B retires in their 40's too, so we gotta hire emplyee C. It looks to me like at some point the government is paying retirement benefits for employee A, employee B and also paying a wage for employee C who now fills in for employee B all before employee A hits the "official" retirement age of 65. That means for a period of time the tax payer is stuck with paying for three people to do one persons job. It's this kind of ridiculous benefit packages that is a major reaason why this country doesn't have any money. Forget all about all of those extravagant retirement and benefit packages for government workers, unionized or not, throw it out the window!
As for other unions, Electrical workers, sheet metal workers, auto workers, etc...if they want to have unions that's fine. If they can have unions AND compete with company's and corporations that are non-union, that's GREAT, have at it!
Someone here mentioned something about unions being the reason for many non-union workers having benefited from them in a cursory way....whether it be monetarily or workplace safety, etc. I do not dispute that either, it's probably true. But on the flip side of the coin...the price of union made goods have driven a very large percentage of jobs over seas.



Reply With Quote