Let the Bubble Burst....

[Tim_T]

Elwood, who would be your other #1 if it was not Pitt?

[elnutsmalljaws]

Elwood, who would be your other #1 if it was not Pitt?

Notre Dame was more deserving than Pitt. Better RPI, better record against the top 50, at least ND won a game in their own conference tourney. Not only is Pitt a number 1 seed but they are the 3rd number 1 seed ahead of Duke. So I guess it is better to win the regular season BE title, lose the first game you play in the conference tourney than to finish second in the ACC then manhandle and destroy the UNC Tarheels in winning the ACC tourney championship.

[Tim_T]

Notre Dame was more deserving than Pitt. Better RPI, better record against the top 50, at least ND won a game in their own conference tourney. Not only is Pitt a number 1 seed but they are the 3rd number 1 seed ahead of Duke. So I guess it is better to win the regular season BE title, lose the first game you play in the conference tourney than to finish second in the ACC then manhandle and destroy the UNC Tarheels in winning the ACC tourney championship.

I agree with it because Pitt won the regular season and that is much more about your entire season. Also, Notre Dame didn't win the conference tourney either. I think if Notre Dame had on the B.E.T. then they get the 1 seed and Pitt gets a two.

[elnutsmalljaws]

I agree with it because Pitt won the regular season and that is much more about your entire season. Also, Notre Dame didn't win the conference tourney either. I think if Notre Dame had on the B.E.T. then they get the 1 seed and Pitt gets a two.

The thing that is even more stupid is that if Kansas is the "#2 Seed in the entire bracket" then that means Notre Dame is the #7 seed in the entire bracket since they are in the same division. Utah State is top 15 team in the country but an 11 seed does not make any sense. Really idiotic seeding and just outlines how stupid this committee is. Must be the same committee that determines the penalty for rules infractions.