Search Fishin.com

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 68

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BOWLING GREEN, KY
    Posts
    2,207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Glad to hear that my 14+lb new state record hasn't been caught yet out of Malone....here fishy, fishy!

    -rich

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Palestine, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    1,733
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Forgot:

    I caught it under the water.

    beep beep

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Talking Re: State Record Largemouth?

    The state lifted the horsepower limit on the lake. will be there real soon.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    774
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    I figured this story was false from the beginning. State and local news don't report much on fishing. BUT, if a state record LM is actually caught and confirmed, the state and local news stations will be all over it... We'll all know if and when it happens.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Palestine, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    1,733
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    It's not false I caught it and weight it on my Zebco De-lair and released it, did not have a camera, so no photo.

    Where the H is Malone

    beep beep

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Quote Originally Posted by HYDROJUNKIE View Post
    Has anyone heard that a 14+ largemouth was caught/weighed in at Lake Malone this past weekend? A co-worker of mine phoned with this news this evening. I know how easily rumors get started so I was searching for any verification. I have predicted that Malone would produce the next record, but I was hoping it would be mine.

    Thanks
    My wife caught one at Malone this last Saturday, 14lb 1 oz, no it wont go down as a record because one would have to let it die; she got 4 photos with it, measured it, 30 3/4" long, and weighed it, then she released it. She doesn't care about being recognized for a record, she cares that it goes back to the lake and lays some eggs. Why not let such a magnificient fish survive?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    .Lagrange
    Posts
    2,542
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Quote Originally Posted by siloa View Post
    My wife caught one at Malone this last Saturday, 14lb 1 oz, no it wont go down as a record because one would have to let it die; she got 4 photos with it, measured it, 30 3/4" long, and weighed it, then she released it. She doesn't care about being recognized for a record, she cares that it goes back to the lake and lays some eggs. Why not let such a magnificient fish survive?
    Can we see pictures of the critter?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Versailles
    Posts
    152
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    I second that motion, please post the pics.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    I am new to this site and am still trying to figure out how to download a picture of my wife's fish from a sony memory stick to this thread. I added the picture to my profile picture, see if you can see it there, if you can't, maybe someone can tell me how the heck to add a picture to this thread. As for the one's who say "I don't believe you" that is your free will and that doesn't bother me in the slightest. The best I can do for you is show you a very clear photo of the fish, not a poor quality grainy Bigfoot type photo and let you see it and judge for yourself. Like I said, she doesn't care about being recognized for any kind of record anyway she thinks the point of letting a nice fish die and haul it in somewhere to "prove it" is just ego driven and pointless, she says "that's a guy thing." Anyway, I am more excited about her catch than she is, she enjoyed the experience of catching it and we are going to our annual fishing trip to Santee Cooper, SC and she is looking forward to READING while I fish!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    472
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Quote Originally Posted by siloa View Post
    I am new to this site and am still trying to figure out how to download a picture of my wife's fish from a sony memory stick to this thread. I added the picture to my profile picture, see if you can see it there, if you can't, maybe someone can tell me how the heck to add a picture to this thread. As for the one's who say "I don't believe you" that is your free will and that doesn't bother me in the slightest. The best I can do for you is show you a very clear photo of the fish, not a poor quality grainy Bigfoot type photo and let you see it and judge for yourself. Like I said, she doesn't care about being recognized for any kind of record anyway she thinks the point of letting a nice fish die and haul it in somewhere to "prove it" is just ego driven and pointless, she says "that's a guy thing." Anyway, I am more excited about her catch than she is, she enjoyed the experience of catching it and we are going to our annual fishing trip to Santee Cooper, SC and she is looking forward to READING while I fish!
    You can get a good berkley scale at WalMart. Maybe you had it on kg?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Gilbertsville, Kentucky, USA.
    Posts
    522
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    If the scale was on kg and it said 14.1, 2.2lbs/kg = 30+lbs.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .Fisherville KY
    Posts
    117
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: State Record Largemouth?

    Quote Originally Posted by siloa View Post
    My wife caught one at Malone this last Saturday, 14lb 1 oz, no it wont go down as a record because one would have to let it die; she got 4 photos with it, measured it, 30 3/4" long, and weighed it, then she released it. She doesn't care about being recognized for a record, she cares that it goes back to the lake and lays some eggs. Why not let such a magnificient fish survive?
    I'm sorry,i don't beleive you.

Similar Threads

  1. New state record elk
    By Tim_T in forum Hunting
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-17-2010, 11:45 AM
  2. state record
    By midnight1298 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 05:05 PM
  3. Breaking news on world record largemouth chase
    By Tim_T in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 06:46 AM
  4. new state record
    By downtime in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-25-2006, 01:48 PM
  5. World Record Largemouth
    By holstonangler in forum Tennessee Discussion Board
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-23-2006, 03:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •