Morehead State????!!!!????!!!???

[MsgMills]

Mills, I am going to use your logic on you just to confuse you....the Big East has more teams left than the Big 10 after the first round so I guess they are doing much better.

Well duh..The Big East had more teams get to the dance, cause they got 18 friggin teams in the Conference...You actually think 11 out of 18 is as good as 7 out of 11.....Geeze man..open your eyes and see the light.......

Srry Tim, but I think all them blows you suffered up beside your head while trying your Boxing Career has totally knocked you senseless beyond repair.......

[Tim_T]

Well duh..The Big East had more teams get to the dance, cause they got 18 friggin teams in the Conference...You actually think 11 out of 18 is as good as 7 out of 11.....Geeze man..open your eyes and see the light.......

Srry Tim, but I think all them blows you suffered up beside your head while trying your Boxing Career has totally knocked you senseless beyond repair.......

LOL Mills, I been punched in the head a lot over the years plus I ain't gettin any younger. That being said there are 16 teams in the Big East, not 18. 11 teams for the Big East out of 16 is roughly 69% (68.75% to be exact). The Big 10 has 11 teams (Still cracks me up they haven't changed the name, especially since they are one of them academic conferences). 7 teams from the Big 10 64% (63.64%), so the Big East percentage is higher, so yes I would say 11 out of 16 is slightly higher than 7 out of 11.

After the first round the Big 10 is 4-2 with a winning percentage of 66.67% and the Big east is 7-4, a winning percentage of 63.64% which is slightly lower than the Big Ten(11). Starting with the second round, the percentages are going to change because there are two games, where Big East teams have to play each other, so a Big East team is going to win two games, but also lose two games. To my knowledge two teams from the same conference have not met in the second round since the tourney expanded to 64 teams.

The SEC has a 40% winning percentage after the first round, but we already knew the SEC was not that great anyway.

[MsgMills]

I stand corrected on the total teams...but come on get that head to thinkin straight and let's get some rootin goin for the teams.....


Go C.A.T.S

West Virginia totally differnent team in the 2nd half......

[elnutsmalljaws]

LOL Mills, I been punched in the head a lot over the years plus I ain't gettin any younger. That being said there are 16 teams in the Big East, not 18. 11 teams for the Big East out of 16 is roughly 69% (68.75% to be exact). The Big 10 has 11 teams (Still cracks me up they haven't changed the name, especially since they are one of them academic conferences). 7 teams from the Big 10 64% (63.64%), so the Big East percentage is higher, so yes I would say 11 out of 16 is slightly higher than 7 out of 11.

After the first round the Big 10 is 4-2 with a winning percentage of 66.67% and the Big east is 7-4, a winning percentage of 63.64% which is slightly lower than the Big Ten(11). Starting with the second round, the percentages are going to change because there are two games, where Big East teams have to play each other, so a Big East team is going to win two games, but also lose two games. To my knowledge two teams from the same conference have not met in the second round since the tourney expanded to 64 teams.

The SEC has a 40% winning percentage after the first round, but we already knew the SEC was not that great anyway.

Your right the SEC was not that great anyway but SEC / Kentucky Fans knew this. It was not the SEC fans that was saying it was great. It was the SEC fans that said it was not as bad as advertised. The Big East is no where near the Godzilla Conference it is adverted with Louisville, Georgetown and St Johns all losing to lower seeds in the first round, Pitt and Notre Dame did not come close to covering the point spread against obviously outmanned competition. The real only bright spot was Marquette winning in an upset over a higher seeded team. The next best spot was Cincinnati at least did cover the point spread as they were favored and did win. You can look at the tourney in all different directions and come up with all kinds of opinions. Sort of like the Kentucky Derby with a 20 horse field, ask 20 people and you will find 20 different opinions on all the horses. If Florida takes care of business then the terrible SEC will have 2 of the Sweet 16. If Pitt and ND don't lay any eggs, then the Big East will have 4 in the Sweet 16 because there are 2 games matching the Big East that will guarantee slots for the other 2. 25% of the Sweet 16, with 1 team in each bracket should surely guarantee at least a couple of them in the Final Four for the Big East, if you go by what has been printed and said about the Godzilla conference this year? I will still stick with the BIG BLUE of KENTUCKY for my pick, just curious how is Louisville doing in the Big Dance?

[elnutsmalljaws]

How are them percentages holding up for the Big East, aka possibly Big Least? Pittsburgh won exactly 1 more game in this tourney than they did in the Big East tourney