Some one will always be offended.I'm POed that you even infered something like that!!!

| Search Fishin.com |
Some one will always be offended.I'm POed that you even infered something like that!!!
Looking like there is a lot of truth in the article...RE: LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...tory?track=rss
The LEFT hates everyone who stands on the right.
They will try to destroy Bachmann just like they tried to destroy Palin.......
Rolling Stone is NOTHING like it used to be...........just another crappy LIBERAL hunk of garbage.....I cancelled my sub many moons ago.
Lots of folks benefited from Farm Subsidies....how about the Peanut Farmer.
Lots of folks benefited from Guaranteed Student Loans.
Lots of folks benefited from Home Mortgage exemptions.
Lots of folks benefited from Energy Credits........
To pick on her because her FAMILY FARM accepted some subsidies, and he has PROVEN that she didn't benefit personally is silly.
SICK of the Media.........Sick of the LEFT.
Later,
Geo
The LEFT hates everyone who stands on the right.
They will try to destroy Bachmann just like they tried to destroy Palin.......
Rolling Stone is NOTHING like it used to be...........just another crappy LIBERAL hunk of garbage.....I cancelled my sub many moons ago.
Lots of folks benefited from Farm Subsidies....how about the Peanut Farmer.
Lots of folks benefited from Guaranteed Student Loans.
Lots of folks benefited from Home Mortgage exemptions.
Lots of folks benefited from Energy Credits........
To pick on her because her FAMILY FARM accepted some subsidies, and he has PROVEN that she didn't benefit personally is silly.
SICK of the Media.........Sick of the LEFT.
Later,
Geo
P
Quote from the LA Times Article" As for the farm, she said it belonged to her father-in-law. "It's not my husband and my farm," Bachmann said. "And my husband and I have never gotten a penny of money from the farm."
As the Los Angeles Times reported on Sunday, however, in financial disclosure forms, Bachmann reported receiving between $32,503 and $105,000 in income from the farm, at minimum, between 2006 and 2009.
"
Ahem! See what I mean
It's garbage. Not sure why her past is supposed to matter when a lot of folks voted for the boob who is now in office. If you recall he was basically a nobody in the world of accomplishments and stood for very little except being surrounded by bad people.
This junk is the left nut jobs feeling the pressure and starting the beat down. Like most I'm sick of it.
Whether the candidate or elected official comes from the Left or Right, I place a lot of value on personal integrity. I would hope the general populace has a similar viewpoint.
Fly there are a lot of folks in this country who only carry one sided coins in their pockets. When it comes to constitutional matters, they forget everything but the second ammendment.They only listen to whatthey want to hear. If the NRA said cow patties wer5e edible, they'd be out the fields with silver ware.Besides many of them seem to have memory problems, since when was Minnesota noted for picking prime sound responsible candidates???It ended with HHH since lets see Jesse, the comic, now another kook.Big deal. Or since some folks are more accoustomed to the newer english, WTF no BFD
You have GOT to be kidding...........talking integrity in elected officials with the TOTAL TOOL we have in office today? REALLY..........
I mean.....REALLY..........
Ayres, Wright, Farakahan, Beer Summit, and about 50 other incidents where this man showed ZERO integrity.
Try again, because this post is a joke.
Later,
Geo
??DUP??, Mod, please delete.
Last edited by FlyLie; 06-27-2011 at 10:06 AM.
So let me get this straight, it is okay that she not only took farm subsidy money but lied about it? She did benefit from it and it was reported on her financial disclosure forms. The question I have is why did she lie about it? I don't really have a problem with her benefiting from farm subsidy money (although as staunch as you are George, you should) because that is what the program is for.The LEFT hates everyone who stands on the right.
They will try to destroy Bachmann just like they tried to destroy Palin.......
Rolling Stone is NOTHING like it used to be...........just another crappy LIBERAL hunk of garbage.....I cancelled my sub many moons ago.
Lots of folks benefited from Farm Subsidies....how about the Peanut Farmer.
Lots of folks benefited from Guaranteed Student Loans.
Lots of folks benefited from Home Mortgage exemptions.
Lots of folks benefited from Energy Credits........
To pick on her because her FAMILY FARM accepted some subsidies, and he has PROVEN that she didn't benefit personally is silly.
SICK of the Media.........Sick of the LEFT.
Later,
Geo
My two favorite things in this world that people do when they are backed into a corner:
1.) Blame the media, despite the fact that what was reported was TRUE!
2.) Direct attention away from the subject at hand by saying "he/she is not as bad as this person!"
No wonder this country is in the shape it is and only getting worse. Sometimes I think we deserve a lot of what happens to us.
I don't SEE where she took the subsidy.So let me get this straight, it is okay that she not only took farm subsidy money but lied about it? She did benefit from it and it was reported on her financial disclosure forms. The question I have is why did she lie about it? I don't really have a problem with her benefiting from farm subsidy money (although as staunch as you are George, you should) because that is what the program is for.
My two favorite things in this world that people do when they are backed into a corner:
1.) Blame the media, despite the fact that what was reported was TRUE!
2.) Direct attention away from the subject at hand by saying "he/she is not as bad as this person!"
No wonder this country is in the shape it is and only getting worse. Sometimes I think we deserve a lot of what happens to us.
I've looked at the financial disclosure forms..........Here:
http://www.legistorm.com/pfd_office/...nn_MN/823.html
You have to give some personal information and agree to not USE this data, but from my standpoint the form clearly states POTENTIAL conflicts of interest.
Her husband inherited the farm in 2010 after the father DIED. The disclosures talk about income from 1995 to 2008.......If she inherited the FAMILY FARM in 2010..........HOW the HELL is she responsible for subsidies taken by the FAMILY WHEN she didn't control ****??????
Her TAX records are public record.....so how about we DIG there and look at her exemptions........
I guess the LA times didn't want to do that because it proves that she did nothing and CLAIMED NO INCOME from the farm.
The article is misleading..........and I think she should sue the HELL out of them.
Come on Tim, it took me about 10 minutes to find the info and prove for MYSELF that this is bunk.
POINT 2......I never said she was a good or bad person. I SAID the Media is painting her as a bad person......
Later,
Geo
