I don't SEE where she took the subsidy.
I've looked at the financial disclosure forms..........Here:
http://www.legistorm.com/pfd_office/...nn_MN/823.html
You have to give some personal information and agree to not USE this data, but from my standpoint the form clearly states POTENTIAL conflicts of interest.
Her husband inherited the farm in 2010 after the father DIED. The disclosures talk about income from 1995 to 2008.......If she inherited the FAMILY FARM in 2010..........HOW the HELL is she responsible for subsidies taken by the FAMILY WHEN she didn't control ****??????
Her TAX records are public record.....so how about we DIG there and look at her exemptions........
I guess the LA times didn't want to do that because it proves that she did nothing and CLAIMED NO INCOME from the farm.
The article is misleading..........and I think she should sue the HELL out of them.
Come on Tim, it took me about 10 minutes to find the info and prove for MYSELF that this is bunk.
POINT 2......I never said she was a good or bad person. I SAID the Media is painting her as a bad person......
Later,
Geo