Exactly, and I think it's understandable that they couldn't. Ridiculous as her defense was, the prosecution's case was entirely circumstantial. As I understand it, they had NO physical evidence linking Casey to Caylee's death. I'll be interested to see what the jurors have to say, if any of them do talk about it. But I don't think that the not guilty verdict means they believed her outlandish story, OR that they believed or didn't believe the stories about sexual abuse. It just means that when all is said and done, the prosecution hadn't proved their case beyond reasonable doubt.




Reply With Quote