
Originally Posted by
rdenny
I would have to ask a lawyer on that. I am not saying your wrong, but the title of the section, "Use of defensive force regarding dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle," typically dictates the scope. And when they refer to, "in any other place where he or she has a right to be ," I am not sure if they would be referring to public places. Given the title of the section they may be referring to another person's dwelling, residence, or vehicle where you have a right to be (like your buddy's house while you are a guest there). Again, I am not sure. That is why I encourage people to make sure to research the topic well if they ever think they may use deadly force in defense of themselves. I consider myself more knowledgable than most in this subject matter, but still find myself scratching my head now and again.
I still agree the guy at the creek would have right to defend himself.