
| Search Fishin.com |
I don't know about this argument. UCONN played like 5 games in 5 days in the BE tourney then took out a 6, 2, 5, and 4 seed on the way to the Championship Game and nobody played more minutes than their star players.Hell, by the time the Big East teams got to the big tournament last year, they had beat each other up so badly in their own conference that they couldn't take much more. Basically it was bruised and scarred up Big East teams against fresh unchallenged teams unscathed by their weaker conference opponents. It was about like going 14 rounds with Mike Tyson of the good old days, beating him, and then having to fight a guy the very next day, a guy who has won all of his fights with quick KOs in the first round........
I say if the Be would split up their conference into two divisions..Make each division play each division member twice and if more games are needed to fill out their schedule then they play teams in the other division like the sec does. Then I think the BE would not get the exact rankings as in the past in the NCAA Top 25. The teams in the BE don't play but like 3 teams x 2 during their entire Be Conference Schedule...which gives teams an advantage on not having to possibly play more power house teams.
So if you only have to play say 2 teams in the Top tier of the Big East and all the rest of your games are against the lower ranked teams..It makes your record look good as far as wins is concerned...But when it comes time to play in the NCAA tournament...You get the results of the BE conference over the past few years in the Tournament.
Give UCONN their due, they won the Tournament...But the rest of the Big East Teams didn't do as well as everyone had thought they would have done.
A lot of up and coming sports writers in the Ky area could learn alot from you boneheads,,,that's awesome.
Oh...gotta go NCIS is on
Morehead alum and L'ville (and UK) fan. Can't lose![]()
