What is really FUNNY is when all the UK Basketball fans are accused of their **** not stinking when a Louisville fan starts **** with a post, see post labeled "Funny". Here you go Diehard Louisville fans that beat on us UK fans for thinking our **** don't stink. One of your own starting a battle they HAVE NEVER OR WILL NEVER WIN. I searched the Net looking for a similar video where it is debated comically or statistically between UCLA and Louisville having the best Basketball Program and I could not find one. Maybe one of you fine intelligent Cardinal fans will post that link so we will all be educated ad to the greatness of Louisville Basketball.

Greatest of All Time Title in any sport is based on results over time. Longevity is a big part of that title. Heck, Roger Maris hit 61 homeruns in 1961 breaking Babe Ruth's record of 60 homers in 1927 but Maris is NOT in the Hall of Fame. What, Maris breaks a 34 year old record that then stands for another 31 years and he is not recognized as a member of Baseball's Hall of Fame? It is because his numbers over the longevity of his career are not good enough.

UCLA, 11 titles, Kentucky 7 titles, no doubt. But does this make UCLA the best of all time? Take the 11 year span where UCLA won 10 titles and they are a Tyus Edney miracle drive from having no titles. Pick any 11 year span in history and take them out of the books and Kentucky has more titles comparatively speaking. Kentucky had 4 titles before UCLA won their first and 2 since UCLA won their last.

Just as Kentucky and UCLA are ALWAYS in the conversation as Best EVER, Louisville and Kentucky fans are ALWAYS no different in throwing stones at each other as well as firing the first stone to start the fight.