
Originally Posted by
RTF247365
Okay...let me try to this a different way.
First, I am a big fan of the A-rig, if that wasn't already obvious. I mean, fish smash this thing with a ferocious strike, and using it makes me almost giddy. My motive...simple. I like to catch fish when I go fishing, and this thing catching fish. PERIOD.
The point of my original post is this. When you read most comments about the A-rig, it is questions about how to rig it, what rod to use, what jigheads work best...questions about how to effectively use it. Then you have tournament directors making posts, rallying support to "ban" it in tournaments. Why? What is the motivation?
My "out-of-line" comments that have some fired up? Riddle me this?
Scenario 1: You have a tournament series that has been taking place for some time. Now this tournament series is a "Night" tournament, and has been going on without any restrictions on where one can fish, except those areas prohibited by federal law. The tournament has its fair share of "home" lake fisherman, and each week, the same group of locals bring in 3, 4 and 5 fish in their livewell. One of the "locals" invites a couple of buddies that do not fish that often. The two guys decide to participate one evening. When the tournament blasts off, everyone runs to their "honey-holes" to fill their livewells. These two guys, unfamiliar with the lake, decide to stay close and fish inside the buoys of the launch site...perfectly legal and within the rules. When the tournament is over, true to form, the locals bring in their 3, 4, 5 fish bags. As chance would have it, these two guys who don't know the lake win the tournament. Naturally, questions about what was used, where did you catch 'em...it comes to light that they never left the ramp. While everyone is running all over the lake, they stayed right there. This makes some of the guys visibly upset, and they pull the tournament director to the side. Next tournament, there's a new rule. "No fishing allowed inside the buoys". Unfair? Fair? Doesn't matter. Tournament directors perogative to set the rules. Either play by them, or don't fish.
Scenario 2: Some local home lake anglers have figured out a way to catch fish in the fall, a seemingly difficult thing to do consistently, by using a common lure, lets say, a crankbait. Now these guys have spent countless hours and days on the water to hone their technique, to perfect their skill, and it shows in weigh-ins, as they consistently fair well while others struggle. Then a couple of guys who never cash a check show up at weigh-in with a big sack of fish, and they share that they caught them on a multi-lure rig that just come out. This infuriates the locals, who have spent all this time and energy to take a common lure and develop a technique to coax finicky suspended fish into biting. All of that time seems wasted. Next tournament, new rule. "Any rig that uses more than one lure in the water is prohibited".
Now, to say that scenarios like this don't happen, well, that is like putting your head in the sand. One can become angry, but if one is truly observant, and takes the time to listen and analyze a given situation...
So, what is the motive? When other posts are questions to learn more about the lure, why are tournament director's posts a rally cry to get the lure banned altogether?? What is the true motivation?
Is is the costs??
Is it because a couple of guys who "can't catch a cold", and never cash a check, now show up at the weigh-in with a sack full of fish?
Just making a general observation.
With all that being said, if the shoe doesn't fit, why put it on??
I RUN TOURNAMENTS AND YOUR COMMENT MAKES ME MAD AS HELL . I WORK MY ASS OFF FOR NO GAIN . LOOK AT MY NEW YEARS TOURNAMENT , NO LOCAL WINNERS HERE . YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT WHAT YOUR SAYING . IF YOU THINK US WEEKEND OPEN GUYS ARE OUT FOR OURSELFS , STAY YOUR BUTT HOME BECAUSE I DONT NEED YOU . SCOTT