
Originally Posted by
stripernut
X2 on what ESOX2009 said.....
i'm imagining that the "clarification" would all but "clarify", more likely it would include laguage like;
an angler is considered to be in posession of a fish when he reaches the point of intent to keep, notwithstanding the intent to revive or retrieve the lure or hook
and most of us would say "HUH" ?!
lawmakers must get paid by the word....
im going to suppose the final say will continue to be left up to the CO handling the situation.....thank goodness we have some pretty reasonable COs around cumberland who seem to have a pretty strong background in the outdoors and alot of common sense.