Search Fishin.com

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: UK/IU

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    948
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: UK/IU

    It was like they missed all the obvious calls and then realized it with thousands of makeup calls. They'd miss a few on KY, then make up for it. They'd go on a run missing some on IU, then make up for it. KY was in the bonus for more of the game than they weren't, but understand it DID NOT affect the outcome.

    Davis was totally affected by those two early fouls, and I think the officiating let to a lot of the "matador defense" that allowed all the layups by both teams.

    In the end though the talent gap was evident and the 12 point win was about how it should have played out.

    Ole "Rhoderick Rhodes" Terrance Jones had quite a different game than the first go around that's for sure.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    474
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: UK/IU

    UK took 20 more foul shots than IU and that determined the score. I wish the coaches could issue a challenge and go to the replay and if it doesnt go your way you are charged a timeout. After saying that I believe UK would have found a way to win this one.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Frankfort
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: UK/IU

    Quote Originally Posted by parker View Post
    UK took 20 more foul shots than IU and that determined the score.
    What determined the score was UK was the better team.

    If they weren't fouled so often, they would have scored more field goals and the free throw differential would've been much smaller. It was a good game plan for the Hoosiers to try to be as physical as possible; no way they could hang with UK athletically.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: UK/IU

    Quote Originally Posted by parker View Post
    UK took 20 more foul shots than IU and that determined the score. I wish the coaches could issue a challenge and go to the replay and if it doesnt go your way you are charged a timeout. After saying that I believe UK would have found a way to win this one.
    UK is extremely quick.......QUICKER than Indiana.......

    With that being said, the BS touch fouls on both sides did get out of hand. I still don't see how UK shot 20 more foul shots than Indiana. They did drive quite a bit, but the officiating was so inconsistent, it was really hard for EITHER team to get a read on how the game would be called. When they started calling the game "right", UK already was in the bonus, and shooting foul shots.

    I'm NOT BITCHING.......UK was clearly faster, and had a great game plan.

    Who would have thought an Indiana team that shot 52% and scored 90 points would lose the game..........

    WOW.

    Later,

    Geo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •