Syria

[Hlleonard]

Unfortunately, there is no STRATEGIC reason to get involved.

Plain and simple.

How about let the United Nations take the lead on this, and RESOLVE IT. If our national interests, our environmental, or our ENERGY interests were at stake, I'd say get involved and bomb them into the stone age.

This is like the Sudan or Darfur......THOSE were also not in our strategic interests.

Later,

Geo

--
Hmmm.... so we should stop the carnage by killing them all... Mr Fisher, if that is what you meant you seem to have a very skewed understanding of what is right and wrong... We cannot save the world from itself and we need to do more minding our own business and letting them mind theirs.

[Tim_T]

--
Hmmm.... so we should stop the carnage by killing them all... Mr Fisher, if that is what you meant you seem to have a very skewed understanding of what is right and wrong... We cannot save the world from itself and we need to do more minding our own business and letting them mind theirs.

Where did he say that?

"How about let the United Nations take the lead on this, and RESOLVE IT. If our national interests, our environmental, or our ENERGY interests were at stake, I'd say get involved and bomb them into the stone age."

You got some type of "kill them all and let God sort 'em out" out of that post?

[Hlleonard]

Where did he say that?

"How about let the United Nations take the lead on this, and RESOLVE IT. If our national interests, our environmental, or our ENERGY interests were at stake, I'd say get involved and bomb them into the stone age."

You got some type of "kill them all and let God sort 'em out" out of that post?

--
I don't believe bombing somebody into the stone age would be an appropriate action for us to take against any country unless that country has attacked us directly... I believe Mr. Fisher overstates his feelings in some debates that we see here.

[Big Gills]

I think the problems of the world should be handled by the worlds leaders. We are all in this together and there is no reason that the US has to be the leader and make the decision to go in there with your guns blazing. We are all on a team as seen in the war on terror. Let the UN decide together what should be done. Isnt that what they do? Just what I think. I think you should be fighting to bring your troops home so they can rest and be with their families and let Iraq and Afghan handle their own countries. The head of the snake was cut off when bin laden and his 2 top leaders in Yemon were killed and we have seen nothing from them since. They are still there but severely wounded for now. It will take them years to rebuild themselves. Time to bring your men and women home and fix your own country first.

[GeoFisher]

--
I don't believe bombing somebody into the stone age would be an appropriate action for us to take against any country unless that country has attacked us directly... I believe Mr. Fisher overstates his feelings in some debates that we see here.

I thought I was pretty clear about American interests and bombing. Too bad you're not capable of understanding what I stated.

"How about let the United Nations take the lead on this, and RESOLVE IT. If our national interests, our environmental, or our ENERGY interests were at stake, I'd say get involved and bomb them into the stone age."

I think THAT was pretty clear, wasn't it??

Later,

Geo

[Hlleonard]

I thought I was pretty clear about American interests and bombing. Too bad you're not capable of understanding what I stated.



I think THAT was pretty clear, wasn't it??

Later,

Geo

--
lol.... You have a good day sir.