| Search Fishin.com |
Question is, can the guy play ball? If so, then, who gives a ....![]()
Like I said fellas I heard the alllegations and they are flimsy at best. Nothing will become of it I'm sure. His grades may be an issue but Calipari and his money train know how to make that work...
The Kentucky faithful thinks Teflon John is squeaky clean, maybe he is time will tell. I said when he hit the bluegrass that he would gey UK in trouble and I still maintain that will happen eventually. A Tiger can't change his stripes......![]()
I disagree. I think that the NCAA makes these little trips to talk about players fairly often. The issue is that it only makes news when it's a Kentucky player.This is nothing to do with the reporter whatsoever. This is the NCAA snooping around at Noel's old high school. Read this line:
"Cindi Merrill and Frank Smith, assistant directors of enforcement with the N.C.A.A., went to Everett High School on Tuesday to meet with school officials about the 6-foot-10 Noel, who spent his freshman and sophomore years there. Merrill and Smith specialize in basketball-related issues."
It has ZERO to do with a reporter with a personal agenda.
Now all that being said, he hasn't played a game for UK, so whatever they find, if they rule him ineligible, will not be on UK, it will just mean they lost a recruit.
Oh really...I have never heard of the NCAA making these trips to question a high school about grades and relationships unless they were investigating something. I seriously have a hard time believing this is common practice. And despite the paranoia of big blue nation, it is not the only time it makes news is if it involves Kentucky players. It is just that too many Kentucky fans only follow Kentucky and not sports in general so they only know about it if it is a Kentucky player. Besides, it helps many of them justify the tin foil hats and the deep feeling of paranoia that everyone is out to get them
You all can chit chat and talk about this all you want, and being a UK fan but also a fan of college basketball in general, I wish the NCAA would set some kind of precedent....If this were going on at Western KY or Loyola it would probably never be seen by the NCAA...If a guy breaks the rules that are set forth by the NCAA by all means rule him ineligible...If not, then let him play...They ruled Enes Kanter ineligible a couple years ago and I had no problem with it...He obviously accepted money, in which you lose your amatuer status...Ineligible...Didn't the Boatright kid from UConn do the same thing last year and get like 5 or 6 games....If the break the rules sit their ass out...After enough "student" athletes aren't allowed to play it should change the landscape of the college game
The bottom line is the NCAA is about as consitent as the weather in Kentucky...They need someone who is willing to do what Roger Goodell is doing in the NFL and absolutely lay the hammer down...You shoot em the first time they step in your yard and they probably wont be back again
I agree 100%!You all can chit chat and talk about this all you want, and being a UK fan but also a fan of college basketball in general, I wish the NCAA would set some kind of precedent....If this were going on at Western KY or Loyola it would probably never be seen by the NCAA...If a guy breaks the rules that are set forth by the NCAA by all means rule him ineligible...If not, then let him play...They ruled Enes Kanter ineligible a couple years ago and I had no problem with it...He obviously accepted money, in which you lose your amatuer status...Ineligible...Didn't the Boatright kid from UConn do the same thing last year and get like 5 or 6 games....If the break the rules sit their ass out...After enough "student" athletes aren't allowed to play it should change the landscape of the college game
The bottom line is the NCAA is about as consitent as the weather in Kentucky...They need someone who is willing to do what Roger Goodell is doing in the NFL and absolutely lay the hammer down...You shoot em the first time they step in your yard and they probably wont be back again
Your response basically supports my position. You don't hear about them until this one reporter with a vendetta against Cal writes about them because it's UK. It's a non-story anywhere else.Oh really...I have never heard of the NCAA making these trips to question a high school about grades and relationships unless they were investigating something. I seriously have a hard time believing this is common practice. And despite the paranoia of big blue nation, it is not the only time it makes news is if it involves Kentucky players. It is just that too many Kentucky fans only follow Kentucky and not sports in general so they only know about it if it is a Kentucky player. Besides, it helps many of them justify the tin foil hats and the deep feeling of paranoia that everyone is out to get them
In fact, I think it's the reporter's digging and contacting the NCAA that likely made them go up there to talk to the school.
Plus, he reclassified to this class, so I'm sure they want to look pretty closely at his grades.
I think the NCAA is a joke and UK and other schools should sever their membership and start again.
Uh, you might want to read my response again. I said I never heard of it except DURING AN INVESTIGATION. My response actually supports my position, not yours.Your response basically supports my position. You don't hear about them until this one reporter with a vendetta against Cal writes about them because it's UK. It's a non-story anywhere else.
In fact, I think it's the reporter's digging and contacting the NCAA that likely made them go up there to talk to the school.
Plus, he reclassified to this class, so I'm sure they want to look pretty closely at his grades.
I think the NCAA is a joke and UK and other schools should sever their membership and start again.
Do you realize you just contradicted yourself? First you say the reporter got the NCAA involved, but then in the next sentence you say it is because he reclassified. You just argued for and against something in the same post LOL.
This has nothing to do with a reporter digging, it has to do with the type of players Cal recruits. He takes a chance on borderline kids and it usually pay huge dividends for him.
As for the NCAA being a joke, I agree. As for these schools pulling out and starting again, who do you think the NCAA is? It is the same universities you speak of.
The NCAA Infractions Committee is a JOKE. They are so inconsistent it is not even funny. Kanter took money and had to sit for the year and the kid from Kansas got to pay the money back and sit for a few games. What is the difference? If you steal a new Camry or a new Mercedes, do you get more time because one is worth more than the other? Until those that break the rules are busted and the punishments are EQUAL AND SEVERE, then nothing will change. This goes for Coaches as well. If Calipari is dirty then bust him and suspend him from College Coaching forever. None of us here are apart of the NCAA and we all can put a spin on every story printed. One side says banners were removed at UMASS and Memphis under his reign so he is at fault. The other side can say the NCAA cleared him of any violations in both cases. Would Kentucky hire him if they thought he was dirty and would get them on probation? Is Cal the best cheater in the game or the beat recruiter in the game? He wasn't suspended or had any violations found to be his fault at Memphis for however many years plus his tenure at Kentucky. I seem to remember a coach at Kentucky in the 90's that started getting NBA player one right after another. The 1996 team was as talented a team that has came along in a while. Kids knew he would get them to the next level and they kept coming, Mashburn, McCarty, Delk, Walker, Anderson, Magloire, Mohammed, Mercer ..... They kept coming. Either Pitino had the best checkbook or the snowball kept rolling downhill for he was the best recruiter or the best cheater.
Well he isn't to good at cheating because his sex scandal proved that!!! Lol
Doesn't the NCAA basically have to check into and verify or clear every athlete? Why is it always a story when it's a UK player?Uh, you might want to read my response again. I said I never heard of it except DURING AN INVESTIGATION. My response actually supports my position, not yours.
Do you realize you just contradicted yourself? First you say the reporter got the NCAA involved, but then in the next sentence you say it is because he reclassified. You just argued for and against something in the same post LOL.
This has nothing to do with a reporter digging, it has to do with the type of players Cal recruits. He takes a chance on borderline kids and it usually pay huge dividends for him.
As for the NCAA being a joke, I agree. As for these schools pulling out and starting again, who do you think the NCAA is? It is the same universities you speak of.
Do you think the UK recruits are really the only ones being looked at? If so,I think that's pretty naive. This reporter just keeps writing stories about nothing so that there's at least some out there who think he's dirty.
He's never been found guilty of any infractions. And with all the extra scrutiny you think he's getting from the NCAA, that's pretty amazing.
