
Originally Posted by
SLP
That is one of the big catch 22 problems with government. If those in charge actually try and be prudent and not waste money their departments are cut and the money goes towards something else, hence they end up less important with less power. This also is a problem with some very large corporations sometimes as well. People will just spend money on almost anything in order to use up their budgets rather then end a fiscal year with a surplus.
Thinking outside of the box, I often have wondered if this would work. Anyone in government that has any discretion over funds, would get a small % bonus of any money saved within a yearly budget. The risk would be some people making cuts that might be to severe, just for the cash. Well that and the bad press when someone gets a huge bonus and it is reported. Of course that person would have had to save the taxpayers exponentially more, but people wouldn't see it that way.