Quote Originally Posted by Tom523 View Post
Like I said if the evidence in those documents proves that he is guilty of a crime, he will be impeached. When Issa gets the documents, and he will through the courts, he will determine if there is evidence enough to impeach Obama. You keep asking "What evidence?" Let's wait and see if there is any. The president invoking executive privilege does mean he is involved. Taking advantage of your fifth amendment rights is a sure sign of guilt but you are not incriminating yourself. It just means that investigators know your guilty and have to find other evidence to prove it. The president cannot invoke executive privilege on something his office is not involved in. If that was the case he could have gotten his friend Blagovich off by claiming executive privilege on the evidence against him.
It remains to be seen whether or not they will get the documents through the courts. But your statements that "The president invoking executive privilege does mean he is involved" and "The president cannot invoke executive privilege on something his office is not involved in" show that you don't know the facts about executive privilege. By your logic, President George W. Bush was involved in the death of Pat Tillman. And speaking of Dubya, he himself invoked executive privilege in a situation very similar to the one with Holder. So are you telling me HE had something to cover up, and might have been impeached had it come out?

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/21/nation/na-epa21