Quote Originally Posted by RoadToad View Post
And what evidence is there that Obama broke the law? NONE. The subpoena of those documents is nothing more than a politically-based fishing expedition.

Issa claims that Obama's invocation of executive privilege shows he must have been involved, and has something to cover up. Yet, he didn't say a word when President Bush did the exact same thing in response to congressional subpoenas. Why do you suppose that is? Yes, it's a rhetorical question.
Like I said if the evidence in those documents proves that he is guilty of a crime, he will be impeached. When Issa gets the documents, and he will through the courts, he will determine if there is evidence enough to impeach Obama. You keep asking "What evidence?" Let's wait and see if there is any. The president invoking executive privilege does mean he is involved. Taking advantage of your fifth amendment rights is a sure sign of guilt but you are not incriminating yourself. It just means that investigators know your guilty and have to find other evidence to prove it. The president cannot invoke executive privilege on something his office is not involved in. If that was the case he could have gotten his friend Blagovich off by claiming executive privilege on the evidence against him.