Not a Birther........but I might become one.........

[GeoFisher]

Hey.....I cannot believe this........the ENTIRE story has been changed. This is NOT what I posted a link to. The quote above is old had and would have not generated my interest.

Rather, the story was about a 95 yr old woman, who worked in the the Hawaii office responsible for the birth certificate. She described a process that was used to MANUALLY categorize and codify the certificates, based on the individual hospitals that generated the originating documents.

It was a compelling piece. I'm going to use google cache to see if I can find it...........because THIS STINKS.

This is what was originally in the story I linked......



Later,

Geo

Here is another link:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1116755

[RoadToad]

Here is another link:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1116755

Really? A tabloid is the best you can do? How freakin' "fair and balanced" is THAT??

DJ, I'll tell you why this "still pops up," as you say. Because conspiracy theorists won't let it rest.

Snopes.com has the most concise debunking of the birther myth that I've seen.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama...ertificate.asp

[GeoFisher]

Really? A tabloid is the best you can do? How freakin' "fair and balanced" is THAT??

DJ, I'll tell you why this "still pops up," as you say. Because conspiracy theorists won't let it rest.

Snopes.com has the most concise debunking of the birther myth that I've seen.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama...ertificate.asp

So, the 95 year old lady whose SIGNATURE is on the birth certificate.......WHO says the birth certificate doesn't have the manual coding methodology included on the certificate........she must be a LIAR.

There is something to it...........

And for the record......all the bull posted by others about photoshop layering......Yea, maybe.

And Road.........I picked the first place that had the information with regards to the 95 yr old woman.....like I said, it was originally in the newspaper link I posted. I wonder why it was removed.........


Later,

Geo

[greenriverman1]

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/arpaio-ob...curity-threat/

??

[RoadToad]

So, the 95 year old lady whose SIGNATURE is on the birth certificate.......WHO says the birth certificate doesn't have the manual coding methodology included on the certificate........she must be a LIAR.

There is something to it...........

And for the record......all the bull posted by others about photoshop layering......Yea, maybe.

And Road.........I picked the first place that had the information with regards to the 95 yr old woman.....like I said, it was originally in the newspaper link I posted. I wonder why it was removed.........

Tell me, Geo, what EXACTLY did this lady say? I haven't been able to find that even now, 4 days later. I can't even find an article giving her NAME. All I've seen is where this guy Mike Zullo CLAIMS that now, 50 YEARS after she signed it, she says that there is a discrepancy in the coding. Why hasn't your beloved Fox News, or any other news agency, interviewed HER? All we have is 3rd hand information, and it's not even a direct quote of what she supposedly said. For all we know, Zullo may be completely misconstruing her words, AND she may not be as "amazingly sharp" as he says she is.

As for why the content was removed from your original link, my guess is that it's because no REPUTABLE news source wants to post this kind of HEARSAY without any corroboration.

[GeoFisher]

Tell me, Geo, what EXACTLY did this lady say? I haven't been able to find that even now, 4 days later. I can't even find an article giving her NAME. All I've seen is where this guy Mike Zullo CLAIMS that now, 50 YEARS after she signed it, she says that there is a discrepancy in the coding. Why hasn't your beloved Fox News, or any other news agency, interviewed HER? All we have is 3rd hand information, and it's not even a direct quote of what she supposedly said. For all we know, Zullo may be completely misconstruing her words, AND she may not be as "amazingly sharp" as he says she is.

As for why the content was removed from your original link, my guess is that it's because no REPUTABLE news source wants to post this kind of HEARSAY without any corroboration.

Well...... I don't know.

I will tell you this......not ONE day went by before the stuff was completely eradicated from the net. I mean completely.

There were audio links and stuff on the Arizona news site, when I first posted it. 12 hrs later, it was gone.

Either it was complete ********, or it had legs. I don't know.

I'd sure love to find out though........AND when someone has the know how , expertise and money to seed google cache so the CACHED pages no longer show up.........well.

Again, I don't know. I do know exactly what I read, and though holy crap.......

Later,

Geo

[jcb]

DJ, I'll tell you why this "still pops up," as you say. Because conspiracy theorists won't let it rest.

Snopes.com has the most concise debunking of the birther myth that I've seen.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama...ertificate.asp

Here's a nice timeline of how the thing just won't die...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...cate-timeline/