Quote Originally Posted by kydonky View Post
This post was not about muslims. It was about the future of Social Security.

The word dhimmitude was never in the Affordable Health Care Act. That is a false rumor. It was not taken out because it was never in there.

As far as Pres. Obama being a muslim supporter that is about as far fetched as you can get. He has done more to stop muslim extremist in 4 years that most did in 8. I too do not trust the muslim beliefs. Look at the atrocities the taliban commit in the name of religion. But Pres Obama has been instrumental in eliminating mulsim extremist leaders (Bin Ladden and scores of others).

Getting back to the subject at hand, the Affordable Health Care Act is written in a fair way so that everyone that uses health services pays their fair share. Every one will pay into the insurance pool to spread the risks.

As far as the Medicare Vocher program is concerned there are two posibilities that would be implemented.

1) All seniors 65+will be grouped into one pool for insurance that will not have any lower risks participants. The cost of this insurance pool will be extremely high due to the health care costs of seniors.

2) All seniors that are 65+ today will be dumped into the private insurance pools driving the cost of private insurance beyond affordable for most. They do not have private insurance now, their health care is provided by Medicare. They are not in the private insurance pools now.

If you look at the Affordable Health Care Act in an objective mannor you will see the benifits it brings to the health care system.
Have you yourself looked the uh "Affordable" Care ACT?

A 4.27mb PDF file plus the 282kb reconciliation.

You can save time on the reconciliation, it just highlights cuts in student loans and plugs in a few 'minor' adjustments to the original numbers. Here's a sample:
SEC. 2303. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS.
Section 10503(b)(1) of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘700,000,000’’ and
inserting ‘‘1,000,000,000’’;
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘800,000,000’’ and
inserting ‘‘1,200,000,000’’;
(3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘1,000,000,000’’ and
inserting ‘‘1,500,000,000’’;
(4) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘1,600,000,000’’ and
inserting ‘‘2,200,000,000’’; and
(5) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘2,900,000,000’’ and
inserting ‘‘3,600,000,000’’.

Try to actually read this bureaucratic monstrosity instead of parroting Democrat sound bytes. Go ahead, I dare you.

How is the 650 billion taken from Medicare for "Affordable healthcare" going to be spent? I can't tell, the act is written to obscure this. The fluff on their web page seems to indicate it'll be used to curb fraud.

The federal government curbing fraud? Does any who pays taxes in America seriously believe this?

Once again, here is the truth. Obamacare is not going to save money, it is going to cost the government and private companies (this means us in case you're not paying attention) unimaginable dollars. Obamacare is going to cause insurance rates (yep, paid by us too) to skyrocket.

With few exceptions, a fresh book of federal government mandates has never solved any problem in this country.

I'll say it again. The government is not the answer.