
Originally Posted by
Hlleonard
--
I'm not exactly sure what it means for a state to grow economically but I suspect Mr. Fisher is correct... I would think jobs would grow more rapidly in a right to work state but to say that is better for the people who live and work there might not be exactly correct as I do believe the growth in job numbers will be piggy backed with lower wages, why else would employers and republicans push for this legislation unless it is a way to improve the bottom line.... There are a lot of web pages that support whatever opinion a person might have so posting links is kinda fruitless, I will post a quote from one of them that I believe to be the truth and I do believe the lower we see wages in the middle class drop the worse our economy will get.
“Right to work” means a dive to the pay scale’s bottom. The long-term impact doesn’t make a state more economically competitive. Instead, it’s a huge cost-shift, making moderate and low income workers pay more while receiving lower wages as a state’s highest income earners receive the benefit.
The average worker in a right to work state makes about $5,333 a year less than workers in other states ($35,500 compared with $30,167). Weekly wages are $72 greater in free-bargaining states than in right to work states ($621 versus $549). Working families in states without right to work laws have higher wages and benefit from healthier tax bases that improve their quality of life.