Search Fishin.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    2,127
    Post Thanks / Like

    Congress and the Gallup Poll


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Frankfort
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like
    It's always been low, but that's low, low. But the problem is, the same voters who will give Congress an 11% approval rating will give THEIR OWN Congressperson a 75% approval rating. It's always the nitwits those other guys elected.

    In the end, voters get the government they deserve. We have the power, we're just not informed or organized enough to overcome the corruption of the two-party system.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    2,127
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by jcb View Post
    It's always been low, but that's low, low. But the problem is, the same voters who will give Congress an 11% approval rating will give THEIR OWN Congressperson a 75% approval rating. It's always the nitwits those other guys elected.

    In the end, voters get the government they deserve. We have the power, we're just not informed or organized enough to overcome the corruption of the two-party system.
    Well said.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    2,057
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by jcb View Post
    It's always been low, but that's low, low. But the problem is, the same voters who will give Congress an 11% approval rating will give THEIR OWN Congressperson a 75% approval rating. It's always the nitwits those other guys elected.

    In the end, voters get the government they deserve. We have the power, we're just not informed or organized enough to overcome the corruption of the two-party system.
    I totally agree with this. We get what we vote for and the people are to blame.

    I'm trying to do my part by voting out ALL incumbents with no exceptions the last 2 elections, but I can't do it on my own.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    11,442
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by know1 View Post
    I totally agree with this. We get what we vote for and the people are to blame.

    I'm trying to do my part by voting out ALL incumbents with no exceptions the last 2 elections, but I can't do it on my own.
    Did the same and will continue. I don't see a situation where I would change that opinion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    1,096
    Post Thanks / Like
    What happened to the philosophy of voting for the best man that I'm always hearing people yapping about, I usually find myself voting for the lesser of two evils.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Frankfort
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Hlleonard View Post
    What happened to the philosophy of voting for the best man that I'm always hearing people yapping about, I usually find myself voting for the lesser of two evils.
    "Of the lesser of two evils, choose neither."

    Charles Spurgeon

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    1,096
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by jcb View Post
    "Of the lesser of two evils, choose neither."

    Charles Spurgeon
    --
    Hmmm... So our officials should be appointed instead of elected... I believe that has been tried in several places around the world and as far as I'm concerned, we seem to have a better system them most of them... If we ever give up our right to vote our great country is finished.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Hlleonard View Post
    What happened to the philosophy of voting for the best man that I'm always hearing people yapping about, I usually find myself voting for the lesser of two evils.
    Because the BEST man now has become the one with the MOST money. Look at races around the country. In most cases, the one with the most money spent won.

    That is not always the case, but it usually is.

    On top of that, the lifetime politicians are ruining the country. If we could effectively implement term limits, that would make a huge difference.......

    Later,

    Geo

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    1,096
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    Because the BEST man now has become the one with the MOST money. Look at races around the country. In most cases, the one with the most money spent won.

    That is not always the case, but it usually is.

    On top of that, the lifetime politicians are ruining the country. If we could effectively implement term limits, that would make a huge difference.......

    Later,

    Geo
    --
    How in the he-double-hockey-sticks did you and I get on the same page... No term limits might be the one worst disease our government has... Money has bought our government and it is doubtful we will ever be able to get it back.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Frankfort
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Hlleonard View Post
    --
    Hmmm... So our officials should be appointed instead of elected... I believe that has been tried in several places around the world and as far as I'm concerned, we seem to have a better system them most of them... If we ever give up our right to vote our great country is finished.
    How in the world do you jump to "officials should be appointed rather than elected"? I'm all for electing officials; I just want candidates that haven't already been bought and sold, and won't be.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    1,096
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by jcb View Post
    How in the world do you jump to "officials should be appointed rather than elected"? I'm all for electing officials; I just want candidates that haven't already been bought and sold, and won't be.
    --
    I agree with you completely but your quote seemed to say if there isn't a good candidate then it is best to vote for nobody and like it or not we got what we got, even if you have to vote then puke it is better than not voting.

Similar Threads

  1. U.S. Congress salaries and benefits
    By HURRICANEBOB in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-30-2012, 02:49 PM
  2. We're getting poorer, Congress is getting richer!
    By Chubminnow in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-29-2011, 10:25 PM
  3. Super Congress?
    By Catfish Bob in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-07-2011, 04:15 PM
  4. Congress may axe subsidies fir activist groups
    By Tim_T in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2011, 09:22 AM
  5. Our Ridiculous Congress
    By Grumpy in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-05-2010, 04:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •