I think this shows that the jury was a good cross-section of America, in regards to how they look at this case. Another juror said she felt that the shooting was justified. This one says it was not. In the end, they ALL came to one conclusion, one that anybody who looks at it objectively has to come to: the charges were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, so the "not guilty" verdict was the only right one.

I just wish we could all move on now.