Dont let someone do you thinking!

[Devils Horse]

Its obvious that alot of you believe what the RIGHT say and really believe it. Do some research on your own and check the facts! You will be amazed what they tell you and why they tell you that! I have never posted anything that I havent checked on 1st. Someone in an earlier post said he or she would put me on their ignore list. Thats ok but why would anyone not want the truth? I dont claim to know the exact truth and am wrong alot of the time. But to ignore anything and not seek the truth about any given topic just dont enter my mind. If anything I post is wrong call me out on it, dont hide me. A good example,alot of people think NAFTA was enacted by the Democrats, that is not the case, do the research and that is just 1 example. I can give alot of them.

The truth can be slanted to fit anyone's beliefs, the example you cite illustrates it perfectly. President Bush did the initial legwork and tried hard to get NAFTA passed on his watch. He did sign a ceremonial version of the bill before he left office. President Clinton did more legwork and actually signed the NAFTA bill into law. So while you are technically wrong (as usual) the truth is somewhere in between. What's your next example? I can hardly wait.

It's obvious you believe what the left says and you really believe it. Your support of the Democrat party means your beliefs include bigger government, more regulation, and more taxes to pay for it.

Many of us don't trust politicians in general, want less government and lower taxes.

You want Mr. Obama's big brother government, while the majority of Americans don't. At this point The President and the Dims are pretty much ignoring the majority and plunging ahead with historical levels of government expansion. The cost is a projected 8-10 trillion dollar budget deficit over the next 10 years. The Dims' projections were a couple of trillion less, but hey a small 2 trillion miscalculation is standard practice for the federal government.

I think the President should assign a "Explain to us Exactly How Much Green a Trillion is" Czar.

[slippedcork]

The truth can be slanted to fit anyone's beliefs, the example you cite illustrates it perfectly. President Bush did the initial legwork and tried hard to get NAFTA passed on his watch. He did sign a ceremonial version of the bill before he left office. President Clinton did more legwork and actually signed the NAFTA bill into law. So while you are technically wrong (as usual) the truth is somewhere in between. What's your next example? I can hardly wait.

It's obvious you believe what the left says and you really believe it. Your support of the Democrat party means your beliefs include bigger government, more regulation, and more taxes to pay for it.

Many of us don't trust politicians in general, want less government and lower taxes.

You want Mr. Obama's big brother government, while the majority of Americans don't. At this point The President and the Dims are pretty much ignoring the majority and plunging ahead with historical levels of government expansion. The cost is a projected 8-10 trillion dollar budget deficit over the next 10 years. The Dims' projections were a couple of trillion less, but hey a small 2 trillion miscalculation is standard practice for the federal government.

I think the President should assign a "Explain to us Exactly How Much Green a Trillion is" Czar.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00395 I am technically right.

[Devils Horse]

President Clinton took office 1/20/1993 and the bill was signed into law by the President on 12/8/1993.

Plug a little frowny face in, because technically or otherwise...you are wrong.

[slippedcork]

President Clinton took office 1/20/1993 and the bill was signed into law by the President on 12/8/1993.

Plug a little frowny face in, because technically or otherwise...you are wrong.

Technically I was right. I did however fail to say that clinton wanted this to pass. Thanks for calling me on this one. I checked the vote and you should double check me because my numbers say more republicans voted for it than democrats. The demos had control and clinton got his support from the repubs. This thread is all about being informed and thanks for checking. So here it is. I am adding this, 61 votes is veto proof isnt it. Clinton wanted to sign it but if not had no choice.