Search Fishin.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like

    China Virus.....Man Made or Natural

    So,

    Let's pull the Corona discussion out of the Ukraine biological lab discussion. It is a good one to have 2 years after corona hit our shores.

    Post your thoughts and opinions....Provide Links to why you feel the way you do.

    MoveOn, while I don't agree with his thoughts on it, posted compelling information, but it had a lot of holes in it....It did not sway me either way.

    My thoughts are it is Man Made, and accidentally man made. Funded by US. Nothing nefarious, but our government is caught up in the "big" lie, and as always, has to lie and cheat to get out of it.

    Much like the WMD discussion and the revered Colin Powell, screaming from the rooftops about WMD.....except none were found.


    Proving or Dis-proving where Covid came from will be very tough, but it will require open minds, and compelling evidence.

    I have seen enough to say it is man made.......


    What say you.


    Here is a good site from fact check. It is anti-man made, but provides a lot of information as to WHY I believe it IS man made. The fact check site makes a whole lot of assumptions, and uses no peer reviewed information.

    Science is Science, and they have not convinced many scientists.....IMHO.

    https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/sc...e-coronavirus/

    I will say this......I cannot find very many articles recently that are about where it came from. I wonder why?

    Later,

    Geo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    jonesborough
    Posts
    751
    Post Thanks / Like
    definitely man made.
    i've had the flu several times in my life and was much sicker than i was with covid but the flu never gave me anxiety and depression.
    i can't prove it was released intentionally but the timing sure looks suspicious.
    supposedly there is a gene sequence in covid that is identical to one that moderna has a patent for.
    what are the odds of that?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    Google has plenty of new articles about Covid Origin

    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    So,

    Let's pull the Corona discussion out of the Ukraine biological lab discussion. It is a good one to have 2 years after corona hit our shores.

    Post your thoughts and opinions....Provide Links to why you feel the way you do.

    MoveOn, while I don't agree with his thoughts on it, posted compelling information, but it had a lot of holes in it....It did not sway me either way.

    My thoughts are it is Man Made, and accidentally man made. Funded by US. Nothing nefarious, but our government is caught up in the "big" lie, and as always, has to lie and cheat to get out of it.

    Much like the WMD discussion and the revered Colin Powell, screaming from the rooftops about WMD.....except none were found.


    Proving or Dis-proving where Covid came from will be very tough, but it will require open minds, and compelling evidence.

    I have seen enough to say it is man made.......


    What say you.


    Here is a good site from fact check. It is anti-man made, but provides a lot of information as to WHY I believe it IS man made. The fact check site makes a whole lot of assumptions, and uses no peer reviewed information.

    Science is Science, and they have not convinced many scientists.....IMHO.

    https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/sc...e-coronavirus/

    I will say this......I cannot find very many articles recently that are about where it came from. I wonder why?

    Later,

    Geo
    The fact that the genetic code can be read convinced me that it was made by nature. The gene sequences are natural and there is no evidence that the genetic code was made by man in a lab.

    Remember this was done when Trump was in charge 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Covid started in 2019 before Biden became Present in Jan 2020. If Fauci gave money to the Chinese for GOF research into viruses it was done when Trump was our President. So it was under Trump's watch that any funding going to China was given.

    I just finished reading the article in Fact check and it didn't really say anything other than to quote others. And most of that I've read before. I just don't post about this in here that much. But yesterday I did a google search on the origin of SARS CoV-2 and found a lot of articles about this subject.
    Last edited by Moveon; 03-15-2022 at 02:46 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Moveon View Post
    The fact that the genetic code can be read convinced me that it was made by nature. The gene sequences are natural and there is no evidence that the genetic code was made by man in a lab.

    Remember this was done when Trump was in charge 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Covid started in 2019 before Biden became Present in Jan 2020. If Fauci gave money to the Chinese for GOF research into viruses it was done when Trump was our President. So it was under Trump's watch that any funding going to China was given.
    Try to keep it on point........I'm glad you are finally able to admin GOF and Fauci was involved....GOF was banned in by Obama, and then re enabled by Obama before he left office. The funding for GOF was given between 2012 and 2015..

    I found this on the funding:


    Starting in 2014, the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, funded the New York-based research nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance with annual grants through 2020 for “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”

    Total funding was $3,748,715. More than $600,000 of that went to the Wuhan lab. Three other Chinese institutions received funding as well. The principal investigator was EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, who, from the onset of the pandemic, has consistently campaigned in public and behind the scenes to convince people that SARS-CoV-2 did not come from the WIV but evolved naturally from animal-to-human transmission.



    I do find it amazing that I cannot find any recent articles, meaning 2022 articles about it coming from a Natural source.

    the next few years will be interesting, definitely.



    later,

    Geo

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    Define gain of function

    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    Try to keep it on point........I'm glad you are finally able to admin GOF and Fauci was involved....GOF was banned in by Obama, and then re enabled by Obama before he left office. The funding for GOF was given between 2012 and 2015..

    I found this on the funding:


    Starting in 2014, the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, funded the New York-based research nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance with annual grants through 2020 for “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”

    Total funding was $3,748,715. More than $600,000 of that went to the Wuhan lab. Three other Chinese institutions received funding as well. The principal investigator was EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, who, from the onset of the pandemic, has consistently campaigned in public and behind the scenes to convince people that SARS-CoV-2 did not come from the WIV but evolved naturally from animal-to-human transmission.



    I do find it amazing that I cannot find any recent articles, meaning 2022 articles about it coming from a Natural source.

    the next few years will be interesting, definitely.



    later,

    Geo
    The definition of GOF is not the same as what I think you are trying to imply. The article talked about some people saying GOF but I don't believe that was the case. Other people said there was not GOF research. By GOF they mean weaponizing the virus. That was not the case.

    The Fact finder page that you posted shows both sides. But most have concluded that more information is needed before making a sound decision.
    Likes GeoFisher liked this post

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Kings Mtn. Ky.
    Posts
    864
    Post Thanks / Like

    Ask Moveon

    He knows it’s Trumps fault it ever happened. Lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Moveon View Post
    The definition of GOF is not the same as what I think you are trying to imply. The article talked about some people saying GOF but I don't believe that was the case. Other people said there was not GOF research. By GOF they mean weaponizing the virus. That was not the case.

    The Fact finder page that you posted shows both sides. But most have concluded that more information is needed before making a sound decision.
    NO.........they do not mean that.

    Gain of Function is using crispr and other tools to manipulate WHAT is natural, and turn it into WHAT is un-natural.

    Journal Nature has a very good article in 2015 from a Chinese scientist talking about taking Bat Corona Virus, splicing it with ACE-2 receptors, and infecting Humans..

    An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

    In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.


    The link:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/natu...012be1a0b9f34c


    THAT my friend, is GAIN of FUNCTION..........and China did it, and Wuhan did it, and other labs did it, and it was FUNDED by the United States.

    Was it done to create a biological killer weapon? I doubt it. I believe it was done, trying to find "vaccine" technology capable of resolving Corona viruses in the future.

    I also think we were able to fast track vaccines, because it was CREATED, and we KNEW the sequences necessary to quickly create a vaccine.

    Conjecture on my part, but I bet we find out down the line this or something very similar is the case.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    It was not done to make a germ for warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    NO.........they do not mean that.

    Gain of Function is using crispr and other tools to manipulate WHAT is natural, and turn it into WHAT is un-natural.

    Journal Nature has a very good article in 2015 from a Chinese scientist talking about taking Bat Corona Virus, splicing it with ACE-2 receptors, and infecting Humans..

    An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

    In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.


    The link:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/natu...012be1a0b9f34c


    THAT my friend, is GAIN of FUNCTION..........and China did it, and Wuhan did it, and other labs did it, and it was FUNDED by the United States.

    Was it done to create a biological killer weapon? I doubt it. I believe it was done, trying to find "vaccine" technology capable of resolving Corona viruses in the future.

    I also think we were able to fast track vaccines, because it was CREATED, and we KNEW the sequences necessary to quickly create a vaccine.

    Conjecture on my part, but I bet we find out down the line this or something very similar is the case.
    The research is done to learn what the virus can and can't do. I'm still leaning towards natural creation of SARS CoV-2. There is no evidence that it escaped from a lab. Now in the beginning I was thinking that the virus had maybe escaped from a lab in Wuhan simply because that is where the virus first started and that is also where they do the research in China. But after reading many articles and not finding any real evidence that it escaped from a lab I'm going to have to say it was not man made.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    B
    Posts
    944
    Post Thanks / Like
    Does it kill Russians 🤔

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    it does not discriminate

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoraSpook View Post
    Does it kill Russians 樂
    It will kill Tigers and Minks. If you don't have immunity to this virus it will kill you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    2,378
    Post Thanks / Like

    Timing

    Too lazy to do any research, but:

    Common knowledge they were 'researching' virus GOF in Wuhan.

    Common knowledge the disease originated in China (likely Wuhan).

    Hard to believe Corona virus just mutated into a deadly strain naturally and showed up there first.
    Likes dragmerc, GeoFisher liked this post

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    That is the best argument for man made virus

    Quote Originally Posted by Devils Horse View Post
    Too lazy to do any research, but:

    Common knowledge they were 'researching' virus GOF in Wuhan.

    Common knowledge the disease originated in China (likely Wuhan).

    Hard to believe Corona virus just mutated into a deadly strain naturally and showed up there first.

    I use to think that too at first. But after reading many articles saying that the genetic code was not man made and that it was more likely of natural origin. Which made me think how does a virus form in the first place? How does our DNA create a mRNA virus?

Similar Threads

  1. 10 reasons scientists believe The China Virus is ManMade
    By GeoFisher in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-17-2022, 12:39 PM
  2. Who makes a good rod not made in china?
    By dac244 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 04:49 PM
  3. Huge Texas Wind Farm's Turbines Will Be Made in China
    By Chubminnow in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 08:30 PM
  4. Natural Gas Smell??
    By flippinstick in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-16-2005, 01:59 PM
  5. Natural Lakes....
    By Stonewall2002 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2005, 02:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •