Search Fishin.com

Results 1 to 12 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Palestine, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    1,733
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Moose what is food corn? Humans basically do not eat corn we feed it to livestock. When you produce ethanol you only lose a portion of the corn for feed stock. A by product of the corn from ethanol is corn oil taken before the process begins they are able to take 90% of the oil out of corn before they start the fermentation process. They can use this for biodiesel. The corn left after the ethanol is removed is called DDGS and is an excellent feed stock. One of the biggest reasons for the rise in corn price is that China, India and some other nations that use to consume corn, rice etc. has developed higher living standards and is now feeding livestock as we do and demand for grain has increased. Ethanol has definitely done its part. What we need to remember is ethanol was not meant as an alternative fuel but as an oxygenate agent. Also we need to remember we are still paying farmers to not farm tillable acres for conservation reasons.
    The oil expert I heard on TV said once given the go ahead the CEO’s of companies that he talked to said they can have oil in 1 ½ year. I can’t imagine it taking ten years to build platform and drill a well this is something they have been doing for years. What you are saying is it will take 10 years because of the permitting that is required today. What I am saying if congress wants to solve our short term problems they can make it happen in a short time period.

    If we would have passed Bush energy policy we would have eight years behind us but since we have set on our hands we need to shorten the process and get oil flowing ASAP.
    And I will bet when this happens you will see future oil price drop to 60.00 / Barrel.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,738
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Quote Originally Posted by roadrunner View Post
    ...If we would have passed Bush energy policy we would have eight years behind us but since we have set on our hands we need to shorten the process and get oil flowing ASAP.
    And I will bet when this happens you will see future oil price drop to 60.00 / Barrel.
    And if we had listened to Carter on this in the late 70's, we might not be in the mess we are in right now....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Evansville Area of Southern IN, USA.
    Posts
    1,170
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Quote Originally Posted by apb View Post
    And if we had listened to Carter on this in the late 70's, we might not be in the mess we are in right now....
    Carter was smarter than your average GOP stalwart supporter.

    Carter was ahead of his time and trying to lead a the uneducated masses who refuse to give up their way of life.

    Carter was supporting the Synfuels which would have used coal to make oil. Germany did that near the end of WWII. South African used synfuels to make coal into oil back in 1980.

    It was the GOP President Reagan that killed the Synfuel Plants in Western KY. By not going with the synfuel plants we set ourselves up to be black mailed again and again by Iran and OPEC.

    Today thanks to our lack of planning over the last 7.5 years we are still in the same situation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    11,442
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Ha ha you sir are amazing! There is no other word but amazing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Evansville Area of Southern IN, USA.
    Posts
    1,170
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Thank you:

    I noticed that you didn't refute anything that I posted. That says a lot!

    BTW I thought you were going to stop this nonsense in here and go talk about fishing again?

    I came back after a few hours and there you are again posting Rush Limbaugh Political Stuff.

    As long as someone is in here posting political garbage I intend to dispute what's not factual and to set the record straight. At least until I get tired of debating again. That could be sooner rather than later.

    I think I'll go work on the boat today.

    You all have a good day now.

    Quote Originally Posted by DJD View Post
    Ha ha you sir are amazing! There is no other word but amazing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    11,442
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Moose,
    I said I was giving up on the news media discussions but the topics are fair game! We can go to the website of the candidates and state facts of what the two say. Well not totally true, Nobama "changed" his site to go with his new policy of the surge is working. Hmmm who said it would work?? Bush/McCain did.
    BTW, CNN Yep, CNN, 1 more time CNN, was stating that Nobama has overstepped his bounds by being a negotiator for the U.S. instead of the Commander In Cheif which is not his position. Shows this guys ego and inability to follow rules that ALL politicians follow. Chalk another aspect of "change" to Nobama...make the rules up as you go.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    11,442
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Quote Originally Posted by Moose1am View Post
    Carter was smarter than your average GOP stalwart supporter.

    Carter was ahead of his time and trying to lead a the uneducated masses who refuse to give up their way of life.

    Carter was supporting the Synfuels which would have used coal to make oil. Germany did that near the end of WWII. South African used synfuels to make coal into oil back in 1980.

    It was the GOP President Reagan that killed the Synfuel Plants in Western KY. By not going with the synfuel plants we set ourselves up to be black mailed again and again by Iran and OPEC.

    Today thanks to our lack of planning over the last 7.5 years we are still in the same situation.
    So by your reasoning the years that Clinton was in office don't count? By your reasoning the fact that since the Dems came to power in Congress and Nancy Pelosi stood up and promised gas would be cheaper doesn't count? By you reasoning the fact the gas has doubled since they took power doesn't count?
    Going back to the Carter years to make a point on fuel? Carter was smarter? Man oh man, yeah his legacy was how great of a President he was! The way the country was thriving because of how smart he was...Lol! Not buying that one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Quote Originally Posted by apb View Post
    And if we had listened to Carter on this in the late 70's, we might not be in the mess we are in right now....

    You are so right. I wonder which party made fun of him at the time? 30 years gone down the tailpipes cause big oil lobbies against anything that will hurt their bottom line....another fact. Corruption runs rampant throughout our government. Money talks and BS walks..................

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    11,442
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Quote Originally Posted by PL View Post
    You are so right. I wonder which party made fun of him at the time? 30 years gone down the tailpipes cause big oil lobbies against anything that will hurt their bottom line....another fact. Corruption runs rampant throughout our government. Money talks and BS walks..................
    I agree! I agree! Corruption does run rampant throughout our government.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Evansville Area of Southern IN, USA.
    Posts
    1,170
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Food corn is any corn or corn byproduct that is fed to animals. Humans are in the animal kingdom.

    A corn based ingredient in a lot of foods is CORN SYRUP. It's found in a lot of our foods as a sweetener.

    I would guess that the cost of corn syrup has increased over the last few years as compared to 5 years ago.

    So humans eat a lot of corn products. When you eat your morning cereal you are eating a corn product as they use corn syrup to sweeten the cereal

    Any food that's sweetened more than likely has corn syrup added into the mix.

    And remember this. We feed corn to our cattle to help fatten them up. They don't get enough carbohydrates from grass so we have to feed them corn to get them ready for market. I took Animal Science at Purdue University during my Pre Veterinary Medicine training. I would never have taken Animal Science on my own but Veterinarians have to have this knowledge about the food that we feed our livestock.

    So I know what the farmers feed to their live stock. Also being in an Agricultural Fraternity at Purdue I lived with 70 of the largest farm owners in the State and lived with several other Vet students in the frat house. I ate breakfast and dinner ever day with these guys and I learned a great deal about how farms work. AGR is the cream of the crop in Agriculture. Our frat brothers became the dean of agriculture at Purdue and one was the US Secretary of Agriculture for many years. Ever heard of Earl Butts? Rest in peace my friend.

    Anyway you and I both eat a lot of beef, pork and chicken unless you belong to PETA and don't eat meat. All those animals are feed corn to help fatten them up for the market. So when the price of corn goes up the price of chicken feed goes up. The farmers cost goes up and they have to charge more for their products. The price of beef will rise as will the price of chicken.

    Ethanol is made from the starch or carbohydrates found in the corn kernel not the oil. So if they take the oil out we still loose the starches to ethanol production and those are lost.

    If you take all the oil and starches out of the corn kernel all you have left is the fiber and while that's good for some things it will not put meat on a cow or chicken. Only Carbs and protein will do that.

    Now a cow has four chambers in it's rumen. So the bacteria inside the cow can break down some of that fiber and utilize it. But it's lost most of it's nutritional value in the fermentation process when it's made into Ethanol.

    We would be better off using SWITCH Grass to make ethanol than using corn. Switch grass can be harvested two or three times a growing season and it can grow on less fertile lands.

    Ethanol used in gas at a concentration of less than 10% is OK by me. But when you use E 85 then you are putting a lot more ethanol into the gas. 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline from fossil fuels.

    Do you know how many atoms of oxygen are on the ethanol molecule? =oh added to the carbon chain makes it an alcohol.

    The US Agricultural program of paying farmers to not use land is a good thing. Land has to rest. Also the land that's not tilled can be use by the wildlife. Quail and pheasants as well as rabbits can use this idle land to reproduce their numbers. By not tilling the grassy areas along the ditches and creeks we give wildlife a protective corridor to live in. And by leaving grassy areas and small woody scrubs along the edges of the ditches we prevent the lost of top soil. Erosion is lessened and that helps stop the silting in of the ditches, creeks and rivers. It slows down the eutrophication process as well.

    I heard the CEO of the oil company say that it would take ten years. Now you are talking about drilling off the coast right? I want to make sure that we are on the same page here and comparing apples to apples. I am talking about ten years to drill offshore. I'll stand by my ten year statement and I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I guess it depends on who we talk to. I have heard the 10 year time period for many years now.

    Anyway I guess congress could rewrite the entire Clean Air Act which BTW was first put into law under Richard Nixon's Administration. Nixon was in office when the USEPA became part of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government.

    Drilling for more oil is not going to lower the gas prices. I read on a web site about a giant oil field that's in the Northern Part of the Midwest. There are suppose to be billions of barrels of oil in this area. Why don't we drill here in Kansas or South Dakota and use that oil?

    The oil companies have permits to drill in 68 MILLION acres of US Ground and are not using the permitted land to drill. Why? 68 Million acres is a lot of ground to explore. Why would they not utilize all that land? Why did they seek the permits if they were not going to use it?

    Are they hording the oil that they already have just to make the price of oil go higher?

    It's not like this has not been done in the past with other commodities like Diamonds. Why do you think that diamond ring costs so much? It's only a rock? But the De Beers Diamond Company hoards their diamonds and keeps the supply of Diamond low. This makes the Price higher. It's the same business model that I think the Oil Companies are using. Then they can blame their lack of drilling on Congress.

    Well Congress is telling them to drill it or lose it. I think that is a wise choice by our congress. Congress is calling their bluff. If they don't start drilling on the 68 million acres they already have permits for they will loose those permits and they will be sold to someone else that will really use them

    Even if we find oil that will last us another 100 years or so what will we do when our consumption of oil grows even faster. China is growing and they have a huge population. India also has a huge human population and they too are growing more modern. All the world is using more cars and trucks and burning more and more oil. It won't take very long to use up the new oil

    What I think we need to do is look at our long term future not just the short term future. We need to develop energy sources that won't run out.

    We can put more research in to solar panels. Just the other night I was watching NOVA and they did a show on solar panels. They are using Nano technology to build better and more efficient solar panels. These have microscopic raised volcano shaped structures that are capped with gold and they capture more sunlight and convert that into more electricity. These new solar panels are 3 x more efficient that the older panels. If these could be put on the market and sold in volumes they could help provide the USA with more electricity to power our homes, cars and factories.

    This electrical power could be used to spit the water molecule and make Oxygen and Hydrogen gas. These gases can be put into containers and shipped around the area.

    Fuel cells can be use to make electricity to run our railroads,trucks, and passenger vehicles for 300 miles.

    Honda Motor Company already has a fuel cell car in production and in use in California. They also have developed solar powered hydrogen fueling stations. Jamie Curtis (Actress from True Lies with Arnold Governor of California and actor) already has leased one of the new Honda Fuel Cell cars. She and a few other lucky folks will be driving around California and not using a drop of oil or gasoline to run her new fuel cell powered car.

    The Military's of the world are now using Fuel Cell Technology to power their submarines. Submarines that are so quiet that even the US Navy can't find them in the ocean.

    One Chinese fuel cell powered submarine surfaced in sight of the USS KITTY HAWK air craft carrier and our Navy didn't know it was there until it surfaced well within torpedo range of our Carrier. These new subs are a serious threat to our navy and our oil supply routes.

    Germany almost cut off Britain from it's supplies during WWII. It the Germans has fuel cell powered Submarines that can travel 600 miles and stay under water for a month at a time they would have won WWII. Britain would have been isolated and the US troop transport ships would have been sunk before they ever delivered our troops and supplies to Britain.

    The only reason we won the battle of the Atlantic was because the German Submarines ran on batteries and diesel engines that forced the subs to come to the surface at night to charge their batteries. This allowed our new radar to find the subs on the surface and to destroy them. But if the subs would have been able to stay under the water for 30 days the war outcome would have been much different. And I must throw in the ENIGMA coding machines and the fact that we captured one of these and were reading Hitlers messages to the wolfpaks. So we knew where they were and what they were ordered to do as soon as Hitlers Chief of the Sub fleet issued his orders to the wolfpaks.

    My point is this. With Fuel Cell Technology the world won't need oil to drive our economy anymore. We can use the sunlight and fuel cells and to it a lot cheaper than using oil.

    Bush's policy was to maintain the status quo for the last 8 years. He and Cheney are getting the last drops of money out of the oil industry before we switch to alternative and much cheaper energy resource that will be renewable energy.

    The best thing about using fuel cells is that they use water to run and produce water as their byproduct. Fuel cells are the way to go.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [QUOTE=roadrunner;333447]Moose what is food corn? Humans basically do not eat corn we feed it to livestock. When you produce ethanol you only lose a portion of the corn for feed stock. E]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    South AL
    Posts
    1,705
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    [QUOTE=Moose1am;333470]Food corn is any corn or corn byproduct that is fed to animals. Humans are in the animal kingdom.

    A corn based ingredient in a lot of foods is CORN SYRUP. It's found in a lot of our foods as a sweetener.

    I would guess that the cost of corn syrup has increased over the last few years as compared to 5 years ago.

    So humans eat a lot of corn products. When you eat your morning cereal you are eating a corn product as they use corn syrup to sweeten the cereal

    Any food that's sweetened more than likely has corn syrup added into the mix.

    And remember this. We feed corn to our cattle to help fatten them up. They don't get enough carbohydrates from grass so we have to feed them corn to get them ready for market. I took Animal Science at Purdue University during my Pre Veterinary Medicine training. I would never have taken Animal Science on my own but Veterinarians have to have this knowledge about the food that we feed our livestock.

    So I know what the farmers feed to their live stock. Also being in an Agricultural Fraternity at Purdue I lived with 70 of the largest farm owners in the State and lived with several other Vet students in the frat house. I ate breakfast and dinner ever day with these guys and I learned a great deal about how farms work. AGR is the cream of the crop in Agriculture. Our frat brothers became the dean of agriculture at Purdue and one was the US Secretary of Agriculture for many years. Ever heard of Earl Butts? Rest in peace my friend.

    Anyway you and I both eat a lot of beef, pork and chicken unless you belong to PETA and don't eat meat. All those animals are feed corn to help fatten them up for the market. So when the price of corn goes up the price of chicken feed goes up. The farmers cost goes up and they have to charge more for their products. The price of beef will rise as will the price of chicken.

    Ethanol is made from the starch or carbohydrates found in the corn kernel not the oil. So if they take the oil out we still loose the starches to ethanol production and those are lost.

    If you take all the oil and starches out of the corn kernel all you have left is the fiber and while that's good for some things it will not put meat on a cow or chicken. Only Carbs and protein will do that.

    Now a cow has four chambers in it's rumen. So the bacteria inside the cow can break down some of that fiber and utilize it. But it's lost most of it's nutritional value in the fermentation process when it's made into Ethanol.

    We would be better off using SWITCH Grass to make ethanol than using corn. Switch grass can be harvested two or three times a growing season and it can grow on less fertile lands.

    Ethanol used in gas at a concentration of less than 10% is OK by me. But when you use E 85 then you are putting a lot more ethanol into the gas. 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline from fossil fuels.

    Do you know how many atoms of oxygen are on the ethanol molecule? =oh added to the carbon chain makes it an alcohol.

    The US Agricultural program of paying farmers to not use land is a good thing. Land has to rest. Also the land that's not tilled can be use by the wildlife. Quail and pheasants as well as rabbits can use this idle land to reproduce their numbers. By not tilling the grassy areas along the ditches and creeks we give wildlife a protective corridor to live in. And by leaving grassy areas and small woody scrubs along the edges of the ditches we prevent the lost of top soil. Erosion is lessened and that helps stop the silting in of the ditches, creeks and rivers. It slows down the eutrophication process as well.

    I heard the CEO of the oil company say that it would take ten years. Now you are talking about drilling off the coast right? I want to make sure that we are on the same page here and comparing apples to apples. I am talking about ten years to drill offshore. I'll stand by my ten year statement and I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I guess it depends on who we talk to. I have heard the 10 year time period for many years now.

    Anyway I guess congress could rewrite the entire Clean Air Act which BTW was first put into law under Richard Nixon's Administration. Nixon was in office when the USEPA became part of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government.

    Drilling for more oil is not going to lower the gas prices. I read on a web site about a giant oil field that's in the Northern Part of the Midwest. There are suppose to be billions of barrels of oil in this area. Why don't we drill here in Kansas or South Dakota and use that oil?

    The oil companies have permits to drill in 68 MILLION acres of US Ground and are not using the permitted land to drill. Why? 68 Million acres is a lot of ground to explore. Why would they not utilize all that land? Why did they seek the permits if they were not going to use it?

    Are they hording the oil that they already have just to make the price of oil go higher?

    It's not like this has not been done in the past with other commodities like Diamonds. Why do you think that diamond ring costs so much? It's only a rock? But the De Beers Diamond Company hoards their diamonds and keeps the supply of Diamond low. This makes the Price higher. It's the same business model that I think the Oil Companies are using. Then they can blame their lack of drilling on Congress.

    Well Congress is telling them to drill it or lose it. I think that is a wise choice by our congress. Congress is calling their bluff. If they don't start drilling on the 68 million acres they already have permits for they will loose those permits and they will be sold to someone else that will really use them

    Even if we find oil that will last us another 100 years or so what will we do when our consumption of oil grows even faster. China is growing and they have a huge population. India also has a huge human population and they too are growing more modern. All the world is using more cars and trucks and burning more and more oil. It won't take very long to use up the new oil

    What I think we need to do is look at our long term future not just the short term future. We need to develop energy sources that won't run out.

    We can put more research in to solar panels. Just the other night I was watching NOVA and they did a show on solar panels. They are using Nano technology to build better and more efficient solar panels. These have microscopic raised volcano shaped structures that are capped with gold and they capture more sunlight and convert that into more electricity. These new solar panels are 3 x more efficient that the older panels. If these could be put on the market and sold in volumes they could help provide the USA with more electricity to power our homes, cars and factories.

    This electrical power could be used to spit the water molecule and make Oxygen and Hydrogen gas. These gases can be put into containers and shipped around the area.

    Fuel cells can be use to make electricity to run our railroads,trucks, and passenger vehicles for 300 miles.

    Honda Motor Company already has a fuel cell car in production and in use in California. They also have developed solar powered hydrogen fueling stations. Jamie Curtis (Actress from True Lies with Arnold Governor of California and actor) already has leased one of the new Honda Fuel Cell cars. She and a few other lucky folks will be driving around California and not using a drop of oil or gasoline to run her new fuel cell powered car.

    The Military's of the world are now using Fuel Cell Technology to power their submarines. Submarines that are so quiet that even the US Navy can't find them in the ocean.

    One Chinese fuel cell powered submarine surfaced in sight of the USS KITTY HAWK air craft carrier and our Navy didn't know it was there until it surfaced well within torpedo range of our Carrier. These new subs are a serious threat to our navy and our oil supply routes.

    Germany almost cut off Britain from it's supplies during WWII. It the Germans has fuel cell powered Submarines that can travel 600 miles and stay under water for a month at a time they would have won WWII. Britain would have been isolated and the US troop transport ships would have been sunk before they ever delivered our troops and supplies to Britain.

    The only reason we won the battle of the Atlantic was because the German Submarines ran on batteries and diesel engines that forced the subs to come to the surface at night to charge their batteries. This allowed our new radar to find the subs on the surface and to destroy them. But if the subs would have been able to stay under the water for 30 days the war outcome would have been much different. And I must throw in the ENIGMA coding machines and the fact that we captured one of these and were reading Hitlers messages to the wolfpaks. So we knew where they were and what they were ordered to do as soon as Hitlers Chief of the Sub fleet issued his orders to the wolfpaks.

    My point is this. With Fuel Cell Technology the world won't need oil to drive our economy anymore. We can use the sunlight and fuel cells and to it a lot cheaper than using oil.

    Bush's policy was to maintain the status quo for the last 8 years. He and Cheney are getting the last drops of money out of the oil industry before we switch to alternative and much cheaper energy resource that will be renewable energy.

    The best thing about using fuel cells is that they use water to run and produce water as their byproduct. Fuel cells are the way to go.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moose, What's wrong, wife won't let you talk?

    We have all read about alternative fuel or heard about it on TV and don't need further definition. Our understanding of the process is sufficient.

    While I know you are "proud" you attended Purdue University, there are others of us who also attended college.....including me. It doesn't take a person with a lot of book learnin' to be one of the best educated among us; it just takes plenty of good old common sense.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Louisville, KY 40291
    Posts
    2,837
    Post Thanks / Like

    Angry Re: Offshore drilling = lower prices? Maybe, maybe not

    Since gas has hit $ 4.00 a gallon on average...Most people have cut back on vacations...But do you think Nancy Pelosi has / is/ going to cut back on her vacation...she's going to start a month long vacation starting Aug. 2nd. Thus this month long vacation will keep the Bill to allow Drilling for Oil here locally in the States and surrounding area's from coming up for a vote.....

    Thanks Nancy, I hope you choke on a pepperoni or something and get your butt sun burned real well..... Hopefully the voters of California have realized the sad mistake of voting you into office and make sure your not allowed in again to keep the USA from moving forward in search of home Oil drilling......

    Wake up people, this woman thinks she's a god now that she is the head honcho in congress......

Similar Threads

  1. Oil Drilling in Brazil
    By Chubminnow in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 03:49 PM
  2. Sportsman's Warehouse - Selling Store Fixtures and Lower Prices.
    By Buckeye024 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 11:48 AM
  3. Offshore fishing trip - Sebastian FL
    By dlewisto in forum Florida Discussion Board
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2008, 01:02 AM
  4. Miami offshore
    By TheBEAST in forum Florida Discussion Board
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-22-2007, 01:01 AM
  5. A bit for drilling through an aluminum hull?
    By bbhog in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-08-2006, 07:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •