Taxes and Politicians

[FlyLie]

As a moderate......how about you enlighten us..........what is their FAIR SHARE......be specific.

Thanks,

Geo

NICE DODGE" Don't meant to call your out to the OK corral, but you have made SO MANY POST on this subject, so where do you stand? ......Seems you have invested a lot of time researching and studying this subject! So, "Where's the MEAT"?

What is the FAIR SHARE of taxes for business to pay; current tax level, increased tax levies or reduced tax levels?....Just wondering about your thoughts?

[GeoFisher]

NICE DODGE" Don't meant to call your out to the OK corral, but you have made SO MANY POST on this subject, so where do you stand? ......Seems you have invested a lot of time researching and studying this subject! So, "Where's the MEAT"?

What is the FAIR SHARE of taxes for business to pay; current tax level, increased tax levies or reduced tax levels?....Just wondering about your thoughts?

OK.

Lets start with Cains proposal.

I LOVE the fact that it is a FLAT corporate tax. and at 9% it will cover those that don't pay ANY like GM, GE, Goldman Sachs, etc, etc.

And at 9% it will probably repatriate multiple TRILLIONS of dollars that are held over seas....

And at 9% there are no ******** offsets that make it tough to figure out a real amount.

And at 9%......fixed, I bet there will be growth.......And 9% of anything > 0 is something....The current system is generating NO GROWTH.

So I'd say about 9% is right.

[FlyLie]

OK.

Lets start with Cains proposal.

I LOVE the fact that it is a FLAT corporate tax. and at 9% it will cover those that don't pay ANY like GM, GE, Goldman Sachs, etc, etc.

And at 9% it will probably repatriate multiple TRILLIONS of dollars that are held over seas....

And at 9% there are no ******** offsets that make it tough to figure out a real amount.

And at 9%......fixed, I bet there will be growth.......And 9% of anything > 0 is something....The current system is generating NO GROWTH.

So I'd say about 9% is right.

Thanks for the response. Cains 999 is interesting, but I still am awaiting reviews and comments from professional economist on his proposed tax plan; 999 sound simple, but when I think about how you define corporate income, reminds of Clinton; please DEFINE SEX?