
Originally Posted by
GeoFisher
Since yo called me out I guess I will POUND on you with facts.......since you don't know how to research a **** thing.
1). California does not legalize pedophilia with SB 145. I'm assuming that is what you're referring to, if not, PLEASE share exactly what you are talking about. Oh that's right, do my own research right....because the all knowing TimE who gets every single piece of information from Alex Jones or worse is the all knowing Oracle of information.
Republicans, and Conservative EXTREMISTS are up in arms about SB145 because it takes the LAW on hand and applies it equally if you are heterosexual or LGBTQ.
Now clearly I'm utterly disgusted by the SB145 statute how it is written, but I am not disgusted with the fact that they treat Hetero and LGBTQ the same way.
Personally , SB145 is disgusting and should be done away with, and it is UNREAL that a 17 yr old that has sex with a 8 yr old would not be on some pedophile watch list...but that is the how the law is written.
IF you think this some how legalizes or legitimizes pedophilia, you're a freakin IDIOT.........and an IGNORANT IDIOT at that.
Here is the exact detail of the issue:
"
While state judges currently have “discretionary power” to determine if heterosexual teens should be listed on the sex offender registry, that is not the case for LGBTQ adolescents, the New York Daily News disclosed.
Judges can currently choose the fate of 14-to-17-year-old heterosexual teens who engage in “voluntary sexual relationship with a partner within 10 years of age,” and determine whether they should be listed as sex offenders, the outlet added.
LGBTQ teens in the same age range who participate in consensual oral or anal sex with a same-sex person younger than 18, on the other hand, are immediately registered as offenders, the Daily News said.
"