Quote Originally Posted by know1 View Post
There shouldn't even be a 73 year old volunteer deputy who is authorized to carry a weapon in the first place. Who thinks that's a good idea?
Age is irrelevant and should not be in the question. Just the idea of a "volunteer deputy" carrying a lethal weapon while "on duty" is the question and no I think the whole concept of a lethally armed volunteer deputy is ridiculous just like the locally elected constables are in Kentucky.